IP - non credere - A sceptical view on IP related statistics

"90% made up on the spot – 10% quoted out of context"

Saturday, 30 January 2016

Diatribe

›
The following rant is a result of sheer frustration about the UK approach to implementing the UPC and UP.. What does the EPC say about pat...
Thursday, 21 January 2016

A dog's breakfast

›
In 2013 I posted a comment  on the contributory infringement provisions in the UPC.  The draft SI makes explicit the problems I saw as imp...
Saturday, 16 January 2016

UK decides on Brexit from EPC and EU

›
The response to consultation on amendment of UK law to comply with the UPC and UP has been published . It appears that the UK intend, at ...
Monday, 2 November 2015

Lies, damned lies, and workplace statistics

›
T here have been recent comment on blogs such as IPKa t concerning complaints made to ILOAT [the Administrative Tribunal the International L...
Friday, 4 September 2015

Who does what in IP?

›
Statistics are fun, you can torture them to say whatever you want. Unfortunately sometimes the information produced is in the form of incomp...
Thursday, 19 March 2015

Europe down the plughole?

›
The Select Committee for the Unitary Patent meets next week to discuss fee proposals that have been widely leaked . The risk of damage ...
Sunday, 1 March 2015

A fair assessment

›
Yet again, in a recurring ritual, the EPO has released a misleading press release concerning filing statistics. It would appear that a more ...
‹
›
Home
View web version

About Me

Meldrew
A grouch.
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.