IP - non credere - A sceptical view on IP related statistics

"90% made up on the spot – 10% quoted out of context"

Saturday, 25 June 2016

Brexit and IP

›
In case you have not noticed, there has been a referendum in the UK voting to leave the EU. This only has effect once an Article 50 TFEU n...
1 comment:
Wednesday, 15 June 2016

How high will the ball bounce?

›
The hockey stick graph is a familiar issue in climatology. A sudden step change in a measured variable indicating something happening in the...
8 comments:
Tuesday, 7 June 2016

But is it appealing?

›
A proposal to increase the appeal fees at the EPO has received recent comment on  IPKat . It is interesting to see the effect the last big...
Sunday, 13 March 2016

Best year ever, concentration, and the future

›
It is time for EPO statistics to come out again, and for once (even without PR spin and puff) they include the slightest indication that bad...
Saturday, 30 January 2016

Diatribe

›
The following rant is a result of sheer frustration about the UK approach to implementing the UPC and UP.. What does the EPC say about pat...
Thursday, 21 January 2016

A dog's breakfast

›
In 2013 I posted a comment  on the contributory infringement provisions in the UPC.  The draft SI makes explicit the problems I saw as imp...
Saturday, 16 January 2016

UK decides on Brexit from EPC and EU

›
The response to consultation on amendment of UK law to comply with the UPC and UP has been published . It appears that the UK intend, at ...
‹
›
Home
View web version

About Me

Meldrew
A grouch.
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.